
In Week 3 of the OVC TTAC Pathways in the Victim Services Field training program, I explored a path I hadn’t fully considered before: public speaking as a form of victim advocacy. This week covered how survivors and advocates can use their voices to educate communities, influence policy, motivate change, and provide hope to others still navigating their own trauma. As someone who has spent twenty years keeping my own story mostly private, this week challenged me to think about what it might mean to step into a more public role—and whether I’m ready for that.
The Power of a Compelling Message
The training opened with a simple but profound premise: compelling messages can be extremely effective. When advocates and survivors share their stories publicly, they accomplish something that statistics and policy papers cannot—they make abstract issues real and tangible. They put a human face on crime victimization and create emotional connections that can motivate action in ways that data alone never will.
Public speaking in the victim services field can take many forms:
- Survivor testimonials at legislative hearings or public forums
- Educational presentations to schools, community groups, or professional organizations
- Prevention workshops that teach people how to recognize warning signs and stay safe
- Advocacy speeches that call for policy changes or increased resources
- Training sessions for law enforcement, medical professionals, or other service providers
- Conference presentations that share best practices and research
What struck me most was the range of impact these presentations can have—from encouraging a single victim to seek help, to influencing lawmakers to pass new legislation protecting victims’ rights.
Why Public Speaking Matters in This Field
The training outlined several compelling benefits of public speaking in victim services:
Motivating action, advocacy, and involvement – When people hear a survivor’s story or an advocate’s passionate plea, they’re more likely to get involved, donate, volunteer, or advocate for change themselves.
Encouraging victims to find help – Hearing someone else’s story of survival and recovery can be the catalyst that finally convinces a victim to reach out for support. There’s power in knowing you’re not alone.
Encouraging law enforcement and public officials to take greater action – Personal stories can cut through bureaucratic indifference and make decision-makers understand the real-world consequences of their choices.
Providing prevention education – Teaching communities about warning signs, healthy relationships, and safety strategies can prevent future victimization.
Providing a community response – Public speaking can galvanize communities to take collective action and show that they won’t tolerate violence or abuse.
Providing support to other victims and survivors – Sometimes the most powerful thing a survivor can do is simply say, “I survived this, and you can too.”
As I read through these benefits, I thought about the certified victim advocate whose training session first inspired me to pursue this field. Her single presentation changed the trajectory of my career aspirations. That’s the kind of ripple effect a good speaker can create.
The Other Side: Drawbacks and Dangers
But the training didn’t sugarcoat the challenges. Public speaking in this field comes with significant drawbacks that must be carefully considered:
Privacy concerns – Once you share your story publicly, you can’t take it back. Even in small, seemingly private settings, stories can spread. You need to be absolutely certain you’re ready for others—including people you know personally—to know your experience.
Safety concerns – If your perpetrator is still out there, or if you’re speaking about ongoing threats like domestic violence or stalking, public speaking could put you or others at risk. This isn’t theoretical; it’s a real danger that must be assessed carefully.
These concerns hit close to home for me. While my abuser from college is long out of my life, the thought of sharing my story publicly still makes me uncomfortable. There’s a reason I’ve kept it private for twenty years. The training emphasized that not everyone should become a public speaker, and that’s not a weakness—it’s wisdom. Knowing your boundaries and respecting them is critical.
Before You Speak: Examining Your Readiness
The training included a section on examining personal readiness that I found both helpful and challenging. The key questions it posed were:
Are you ready to tell your story? – Just because you’re healed enough to function doesn’t mean you’re healed enough to share publicly. These are different thresholds.
Which parts of your experience are you ready to share? – You don’t have to share everything. Deciding what stays private and what you’re comfortable making public is an important part of preparation.
Do you have support? – You shouldn’t do this alone. Having a therapist, trusted friends, or other survivors who understand what you’re doing is essential.
What types of support do you have? – Emotional support is crucial, but so is practical support—someone who can help you prepare, someone who can be there after difficult presentations, someone who can help you debrief.
Honestly, answering these questions for myself, I’m not sure I’m ready for public speaking about my own experience. I’m comfortable writing about it in this blog, where I have control over the narrative and can maintain some emotional distance. But standing in front of a room full of people and speaking about the most painful period of my life? That feels different—more exposed, more vulnerable, more permanent.
And that’s okay. The training made it clear that advocacy takes many forms, and not every advocate needs to be a public speaker.
Planning Your Message: Strategy Over Emotion
For those who do choose to speak publicly, the training provided excellent guidance on how to craft an effective presentation. The key is to translate your goal into two or three clear message points rather than simply recounting your experience chronologically.
This approach recognizes that effective advocacy speaking isn’t just therapy in public—it’s strategic communication with a purpose. You start with what you want your audience to take away, then determine how your personal experience supports those key points.
For example, if I were to develop a presentation for law firms about trauma-informed practice, my message points might be:
- The legal process itself can retraumatize victims
- Simple accommodations can make an enormous difference in client experience
- Trauma-informed practice isn’t just ethical—it leads to better outcomes
Only then would I selectively share elements of my personal experience and professional observations that illustrate these points.
The training emphasized creating a general presentation that can be modified based on the audience. What you share with law students might be different from what you share with legislators, which might be different from what you share with a support group of survivors.
The Nuts and Bolts: Practical Presentation Skills
One of the most valuable parts of this week was the practical guidance on how to actually deliver a presentation. As someone with some public speaking experience from my legal career, I found this section reassuring—many of the same principles apply.
Preparation is everything:
- Practice extensively, but don’t memorize word-for-word (you’ll sound robotic)
- Know your topic inside and out so you can handle unexpected questions
- Be clear on your presentation goals
- Make notes that work for you—paraphrase, use bullet points, note where you want to add personal stories
- Practice with any visual aids or equipment you’ll use
- Know your audience and adjust your tone accordingly
Delivery techniques:
- Maintain eye contact and shift your gaze around the room
- Talk with the audience, not to them
- Watch for audience reactions and adjust accordingly
- Maintain a rhythm, but vary your pace for emphasis
- Use pauses effectively—don’t rush through
Handling questions:
- Listen to the entire question before responding
- Pause before answering to collect your thoughts
- Thank the person for their question
- Repeat or paraphrase the question so everyone hears it
- Keep answers brief and on-topic
- Ask if you’ve answered their question adequately
What I appreciated most was the emphasis on being yourself. The training acknowledged that different speakers have different styles—some are energetic and dynamic, others are quiet and contemplative. Both can be equally effective if authentic.
Guidelines for Survivor Testimonials
For survivors specifically, the training provided crucial guidelines that differ from general public speaking advice:
Focus on your strengths, not just your trauma – Your presentation should show your resilience and growth, not just what happened to you.
Provide a content warning – Let the audience know you’ll be sharing a traumatic experience so they can prepare themselves emotionally or step out if needed.
Keep the recounting of the experience itself short – The training emphasized that you should relay the impact of trauma by sharing your response during and after the experience, not the graphic details of the experience itself.
Rehearse with trusted supporters – Practice your testimonial with a counselor, therapist, or trusted friend who can help you gauge whether you’re ready and whether your message is effective.
Focus on trauma resolution – End with hope, healing, and forward movement. Your audience needs to see that recovery is possible.
Make support available for the audience – Particularly in settings with other victims or survivors, ensure there are resources available for people who may be triggered by your story.
These guidelines particularly resonated with me. They acknowledge that survivor testimonials serve a different purpose than simply “telling your story”—they’re meant to educate, inspire, and create change while respecting both your boundaries and your audience’s emotional wellbeing.
Watching Real Examples: What Works
This week included watching actual survivor testimonials and speeches. I watched Lauren Book’s TEDx talk “From Victim to Survivor: Find Your X…But First, Find Your (Wh)Y?” and Leanna’s burglary survivor testimonial.
Lauren Book’s presentation was masterful. She wove her personal story of childhood sexual abuse into a broader message about finding purpose and using your pain to help others. What made it effective wasn’t the graphic details of what happened to her—she kept those minimal. Instead, she focused on how she transformed her trauma into action, founding a foundation that has helped countless other survivors.
Her central theme—finding your “why” before you can find your path forward—resonated deeply with me. It’s essentially what I’m doing through this training and these blog posts: figuring out why I want to work in victim services, which will help me determine how I should do that work.
Leanna’s testimonial was much shorter but equally impactful. She shared how a burglary affected her sense of safety in her own home and how victim services helped her through the recovery process. The brevity actually made it more powerful—she didn’t overexplain, she just spoke from the heart about what she needed and what helped.
Both presentations demonstrated the S.T.A.R. moment technique the training mentioned—building up to Something They’ll Always Remember. For Lauren Book, it was the moment she decided to walk from Tallahassee to Miami to raise awareness. For Leanna, it was realizing she could feel safe at home again with the right support.
The Business Side: Public Speaking as a Profession
What surprised me most this week was learning about public speaking as an actual career path within victim services. I had thought of it mainly as something advocates and survivors do occasionally as part of their advocacy work, not as a primary profession.
But the training covered the business aspects quite thoroughly:
Gathering information about events – Understanding your audience, the venue, time constraints, and what the organizers hope to accomplish.
Marketing yourself – Writing a professional bio, creating learning objectives for conference proposals (we even got a whole guide on writing measurable learning objectives using action verbs), developing a speaker request form for clients.
Setting and negotiating fees – Determining what your time and expertise are worth, learning how to negotiate without undervaluing yourself.
The training provided practical do’s and don’ts for negotiating speaker fees:
DO:
- Research the organization where you’ll offer your services
- Know what you want in terms of a fee
- Ask for what you want
- Talk less, listen more
- Make sure both sides are willing to make concessions
- Follow up in writing
DON’T:
- Immediately offer to take a lower fee if the client says they can’t pay what you requested
- Negotiate with someone who doesn’t make final decisions
- Agree to something that feels wrong
- Fall for “But it’s a great opportunity!” (exposure doesn’t pay bills)
- Be afraid to walk away
As someone with a legal background, I appreciated this practical business guidance. It treats public speaking as the professional skill it is, not just as “sharing your story.” Your expertise, whether from lived experience or professional knowledge, has value.
Where I Stand: My Complicated Relationship with Public Speaking
I need to be honest: public speaking about my personal experience terrifies me in a way that speaking about legal issues or professional topics doesn’t.
I’ve done some public speaking in my career. I’ve argued in court, presented at meetings, and given case presentations. I’m not afraid of standing in front of a room full of people and talking. But those presentations have always been professional—they’re about legal principles, case strategies, and professional expertise. They’re not about my deepest personal trauma.
The thought of standing in front of a group and saying, “When I was 19, I was beaten by my partner” makes my chest tighten. It’s one thing to write about it here, where I can edit and refine until I feel safe with what I’m sharing. It’s another thing entirely to say it out loud to people who are looking at me, watching my face, judging whether I’m credible, perhaps pitying me or doubting me or relating to me in ways I can’t control.

But here’s something I realized this week: I’m already doing a form of public speaking. Running this blog—Fierce Grace Advocacy—which chronicles my path to becoming a certified victim advocate as well as my personal journey of healing from trauma, is itself a kind of public speaking. I am being open and honest about my experiences, about what troubles me, about what inspires me, and about what drives me toward using my own story of survival as fuel to do good work in the future, to be better for others.
Writing a blog may not be going up on a stage and speaking, but the stories told here are no less from the heart, no less honest and open—and public! This is open to the whole wide internet. And I do think there is power in that kind of public sharing.
For me, it is cathartic. No longer hiding or ignoring what happened to me in the past takes away its power over me. It puts the shame where it belongs—on my abusers. I need not be afraid or ashamed of my experience. And I hope that sharing my story inspires someone to join me in victim advocacy, or at least makes them feel less alone.
So perhaps I’ve already crossed a threshold I didn’t realize I was crossing. Perhaps the question isn’t “Will I ever do public speaking about my experience?” but rather “What forms of public speaking am I already comfortable with, and might I expand from there?”
And yet.
The training asked us to consider our ultimate goal as a personal speaker and what we hope to gain by sharing. When I think about that, I realize my goal wouldn’t be primarily about my own healing—though that might be a side benefit. My goal would be to reach other people in the legal profession and help them understand why trauma-informed practice matters and what difference it makes in victims’ lives.
Could I do that without sharing my personal story? Probably. I could speak from my professional experience with clients, from my research, from what I’ve learned in this training. But would it have the same impact? Probably not. There’s a reason survivor testimonials are so powerful—they make abstract concepts visceral and real.
So I’m sitting with this discomfort and uncertainty. I don’t have to decide right now whether I’ll ever become a public speaker about my experience. But this week’s training showed me that if I do choose that path, there are ways to do it thoughtfully, safely, and strategically.
The Skills and Education Needed
The training outlined several key skills for effective public speaking in victim services:
- Strong communication skills (both verbal and written)
- Ability to connect emotionally with audiences
- Comfort with vulnerability while maintaining appropriate boundaries
- Research and preparation abilities
- Adaptability to different audiences and settings
- Professional presentation skills
- Business and negotiation skills (if pursuing this as a career)
- Understanding of trauma and its impacts
- Knowledge of available resources and services
For survivors specifically, the training emphasized that having personal experience isn’t enough. You also need:
- Sufficient distance from your trauma to speak about it without retraumatizing yourself
- Strong support systems
- Understanding of how your story can serve a larger purpose
- Ability to focus on hope and healing, not just pain
Looking at this list, I can see areas where I’m strong (communication skills, research abilities, professional presentation experience) and areas where I need growth (comfort with vulnerability about this particular topic, managing my own emotional responses).
My Reflection: Different Paths, Different Voices
This week challenged me to think about advocacy as existing on a spectrum. On one end, there’s direct service work—the advocates who staff hotlines, accompany victims to court, coordinate services. On the other end, there’s public advocacy—the speakers who influence policy, educate communities, and change cultural narratives.
I’ve been thinking about myself as moving toward the direct service end of that spectrum. But this week made me realize that there might be a role for me in public advocacy as well, particularly around trauma-informed legal practice.
Here’s what I’m thinking: Maybe I don’t need to share my personal survivor story publicly to be effective. Maybe my contribution is using my legal expertise, combined with my understanding of trauma (both personal and professional), to help legal professionals provide better service to victims. I could speak at bar association events, law schools, and legal conferences about trauma-informed practice without necessarily disclosing my personal history.
Or maybe someday, when I’m further along in my own healing and have more distance from my experience, I’ll feel ready to integrate my personal story into those presentations. That certified victim advocate who inspired me shared her own experience—it made her message more powerful. But I don’t think she led with her trauma; she led with her expertise and used her experience strategically to illustrate key points.
The training’s emphasis on having a clear goal and message rather than just “telling your story” actually makes public speaking feel less daunting. It’s not about putting all your pain on display; it’s about strategic communication in service of a larger purpose.
Practical Takeaway: The Presentation Skills Worksheet
One of the practical activities this week was completing a worksheet on presentation skills. It asked us to describe methods for:
- Preparing a presentation
- Delivering a presentation
- Listening to your audience
- Handling questions and answers
Completing this worksheet reminded me that I already have many of these skills from my legal work. I know how to:
- Research my audience and adjust tone accordingly
- Create an outline and working draft
- Use visual aids effectively
- Maintain eye contact and read audience reactions
- Handle Q&A sessions professionally
- Thank people for their engagement
What I need to develop is the courage and emotional readiness to apply these skills to more personal content. That’s the growth edge for me—not the technical skills of public speaking, but the emotional vulnerability it requires when speaking about trauma.
Overcoming Nervousness: Permission to Be Human
One section of the training particularly spoke to me: overcoming nervousness. The guidance was surprisingly compassionate:
- Go ahead and be nervous – It’s normal and even expected
- Visualize yourself speaking successfully
- Realize people want you to succeed – Audiences generally aren’t hoping you’ll fail
- Go slowly – You don’t have to rush
- Concentrate on the message, not the medium – Focus on what you’re saying, not how you look or sound
- Gain experience – It gets easier with practice
- Learn relaxation techniques – Deep breathing, grounding exercises
The training even included a brief relaxation activity to practice before presentations. I appreciated that it acknowledged nervousness as normal rather than something to overcome or hide. Even experienced speakers get nervous. The difference is they’ve learned to manage it.
This felt important to hear as someone who tends to hold herself to very high standards. I don’t have to be perfectly composed and completely unaffected to be an effective speaker. In fact, showing some vulnerability and emotion might actually make my message more relatable and impactful.
Looking Ahead
As I complete Week 3 of this training, I’m carrying forward a more nuanced understanding of advocacy. Not all advocacy happens in quiet conversations in crisis centers. Sometimes it happens on stages, in legislative chambers, at community meetings, and in conference halls.
I’m also carrying forward permission to not have all the answers yet about what my path will look like. Public speaking about my experience might be part of my future advocacy work, or it might not. Either way is valid. What matters is that I’m thoughtfully considering the options and being honest with myself about what I’m ready for and what serves the larger goal of helping other victims.
The training emphasized creating a general presentation that can be modified based on audience and circumstances. That feels like a good metaphor for this entire journey. I’m developing the general framework of my advocacy path—my skills, my knowledge, my understanding of what victims need. How exactly I deploy that framework—whether through direct services, legal practice, program administration, or public speaking—can evolve as I grow and learn more about myself and this field.
What I know for certain is this: victim advocacy needs many different voices, many different approaches, and many different types of courage. Some advocates show courage by answering crisis hotline calls at 2 AM. Others show it by standing in front of hostile legislators demanding policy change. Others show it by sitting with a victim in a cold police station while they give a statement. And others show it by standing on a stage and saying, “This happened to me, and here’s what I learned.”
All of these forms of courage matter. All of these voices are needed.
Next week’s training takes this concept of using your voice even further—Week 4 explores activism in victim services. We’ll be learning about working with public policy and lawmakers, holding public discussions about victim services issues, and engaging with the media. As someone with a legal background who understands how policy shapes the systems victims must navigate, I’m particularly interested to see how activism might be another avenue for creating the change I want to see in how the legal field serves victims. The line between public speaking and activism feels thin—both involve using your voice strategically to create change. I’m curious to explore where one ends and the other begins.
Take the Next Step
Considering public speaking as part of your advocacy work? The training emphasized that not everyone should become a public speaker, and that’s wisdom, not weakness. But if you feel called to use your voice publicly, take time to honestly assess your readiness using the questions outlined in this post. Ensure you have strong support systems in place, practice extensively, and remember that strategic communication serves victims better than simply recounting trauma. Organizations like the National Organization for Victim Assistance (NOVA) and various Speaker’s Bureaus can provide opportunities and training for advocates and survivors interested in public speaking.
For legal professionals: Consider how you might use your expertise to educate other lawyers, judges, and legal staff about trauma-informed practice. You don’t need to be a survivor to be an effective advocate for systemic change in how the legal system treats victims.
Next week’s training moves into activism—exploring how to work with policymakers and the media to create systemic change in victim services. Stay tuned for Week 4.
Have you done any public speaking about your experiences or professional work in victim services? What was that experience like? For survivors: have you considered sharing your story publicly, and what holds you back or moves you forward? I’d genuinely love to hear your thoughts in the comments.